Justia Badge
Thumbtack Top Pro - 2016
Best of 2016 Thumbtack
The National Trial Lawyers - Top 40 under 40
The National Trial Lawyers - Top 100 Trial Lawyers
Expertise - Best DUI Lawyers in Tampa 2020
Expertise - Best Criminal Defense Lawyers in Tampa 2020
Expertise - Best DUI Lawyers in Tampa 2021

The Bill Cosby Mistrial

On Saturday, June 17th, 2017, the trial of famed comedian Bill Cosby was declared a mistrial due to a hung jury. Cosby was charged for the 2004 sexual assault of Andrea Constand that was recently brought to light. Over the past two years, almost sixty women have come forward to accuse Cosby of sexually assaulting them. The women’s stories span decades, telling eerily similar stories of being drugged and then raped. However, the statute of limitations for most of these incidents has long since passed. In the state of Pennsylvania, the statute of limitations for rape, sexual assault or abuse is 12 years. Consequently, Cosby is facing at least ten civil lawsuits brought by women who cannot pursue criminal charges.

In late 2015, three felony charges of indecent assault were brought against Cosby. For each charge, he faces a maximum of ten years in prison. He is accused of drugging and sexually assaulting Constand in 2004 at his home near Philadelphia.

The jurors took six days to deliberate before they declared a hung jury. During this time, they asked to hear several testimonies again, including Cosby’s testimony that the sexual activity was consensual. They also requested clarification of the term “reasonable doubt” and its applications to the case. “Reasonable doubt” is any amount of doubt that causes a juror to be unsure of the defendant’s guilt. This means that if a juror is almost convinced that the defendant is guilty, but still has some doubts, this constitutes reasonable doubt and the juror should vote for acquittal. This element of reasonable doubt is likely what caused the hung jury. Evidently, some jurors had doubts and some did not.

The prosecution in this case argued that Cosby drugged Constand by giving her pills that rendered her immobile and semi-conscious, before touching her without consent. The defense argued that Cosby and Constand had a romantic relationship and engaged in consensual sexual acts, and that the pills given to Constand were only Benadryl. The most important aspect of the case hinged on whether or not consent was given for the acts in question.

During the 2005 civil suit brought against Cosby by Constand, he admitted to keeping Quaaludes in order to give to women that he wanted to sleep with. However, the drugs in question are commonly used as party drugs, and it is possible that some jurors believed Constand took the pills consensually before engaging in sexual acts with Cosby.

Another element that may have caused jurors to doubt is that the incident between Cosby and Constand occurred thirteen years before the trial. They may have doubted the ability of both parties to deliver consistent testimony of an event that occurred more than a decade ago. Jurors do not need to think Constand lied in order to acquit Cosby. All that it takes is the realization that human memory is imperfect and mistakes can be made.

By lunchtime on Saturday, District Attorney Kevin R. Steele announced that his office would retry Cosby, and that Constand is on board and ready to testify again.

Client Reviews
Pallegar Law, always put my family first, their team always explained things in full detail, and got the very best results possible. They genuinely care. Our family will forever be grateful. Thank you. Dennis
He took me on and from the word go communicated everything in a timely and professional fashion about how everything is going to be played it; and then delivered word for word. The best part about them apart from their professionalism and efficiency would have to be their honesty which lets you entrust them, which in today's day and age is a rare virtue. Hemant
Excellent communication skills between the staff and client. I always felt I was in the know as to what to expect next. Ajay was up front on possible outcomes of the case and did not promise unrealistic results. Hope to not need them again, but definitely would recommend them. Steve
Ajay made me feel like I was the only case he had, and that he put all of his time making sure I was properly defended. Thanks to Ajay professionalism and attention to detail all my charges were dropped. I one hundred percent recommend Ajay Pallegar as your next defense lawyer. Eric